JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)January 27, 2009

A- de 2009

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Mauricio Novoa Zambrano Vs. Comisión Nacional De Servicio Civil

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Suscitado Entre El Juzgado Diecisiete Civil Del Circuito De Bogota Y El Tribunal Superior Del Distrito Judicial De Bogota –Sala Civil-. Se Resolvio Remitir El Expediente De La Referencia Al Tribunal Superior De Distrtito Judicial De Bogota, Sala Civil Para Que Adelante La Correspondiente Actuacion Judicial.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Aplicación
  • Determina la autoridad judicial que debe asumir sin mayores dilaciones
Accion De Tutela Contra Entidad Del Orden Nacional
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Accion De Tutela Contra La Comision Nacional De Servicio Civil
  • Competencia del Tribunal Superior, Administrativo y Consejo Seccional de la Judicatura
Comisión Nacional Del Servicio Civil
  • Autoridad pública del orden nacional
  • Naturaleza jurídica
6 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REMITIR el expediente al Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Bogota -Sala Civil-, para que adelante la correspondiente actuacion judicial.
  2. SEGUNDO. Comuniquese al Juzgado Diecisiete Civil del Circuito de Bogota lo aqui resuelto.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.